- Robin van Veen - AI Automation
- Posts
- AI is rarely the real problem
AI is rarely the real problem
What 12 months of real implementations taught me
Implementing AI in businesses is rarely a technical problem.
After 12 months of building, breaking, fixing, and re automating, I collected 24 insights I wish I had known earlier.
Not from theory.
From real implementations.
Here they are.
Companies don’t want AI. They want less friction.
Automations usually fail because of unclear processes, not tools.
“We don’t have data” often means “we don’t have structure.”
AI without a clear owner dies within 30 days.
One solid automation beats ten half finished ones.
Employees don’t sabotage AI. They just don’t understand it yet.
If you can’t explain it to an intern, it’s too complex.
AI works better with rules than with freedom.
Manual steps are often intentional, not accidental.
80 percent of the value lives in the first 20 percent of the workflow.
Companies overestimate what AI can do and underestimate what it already does.
Without a fallback plan, no one trusts your automation.
AI makes bad processes faster, not better.
Security concerns are often fear, not reality.
If it doesn’t save time, it’s not an automation.
Internal adoption matters more than performance.
AI tools change. Principles don’t.
The best use cases start boring.
Custom beats fancy. Always.
Implementing AI is change management disguised as tech.
The simpler the dashboard, the more it gets used.
Perfection delays launch more than bugs.
No measurement means no value.
The real ROI shows up after month two.
Bottom line:
AI is not a magic layer on top of your business.
It’s a magnifying glass.
And whatever it magnifies needs to be there first.
Robin